|
Hear
Technologies, Hear Back System
by Bill Evans & Jamie Rio
Artists and sound providers rapid acceptance of professional
earphone monitors (PEMs) has, inevitably perhaps, led to other changes
in the way we do things, which means new technology and more gear.
The thing about PEMs, from the performers perspective, is
that the monitor mix becomes more crucial than ever, and with the
personal nature of PEMs, what is a good monitor mix
gets pretty subjective. It goes like this: it is one thing to have
a solid, if not exactly what I want, mix in a wedge
at your feet. It is altogether different when that mix is right
in your head. Of course when you are doing big enough jobs to have
separate FOH and MON mixers and desks all is groovy. But for smaller
gigscorporates, churches, anything where you are providing
both FOH and MON mixes from a single deskhow do you keep eight
band members happy with a couple of pre-fader aux sends?
There have been a number of matrix-type add-on products out there
that have tried with varying degrees of success to address this,
but the Hear Back system from Hear Technologies has a solution that
is elegant, inexpensive, flexible and easy enough to use that you
can trust a drummer with it.
The two-part Hear Back system consists of a 1R hub that takes up
to eight audio signals (analog or digital) and sends them along
via standard Cat 5 Ethernet cable to as many as eight mixers (which
get their power from the same Cat 5 cable). The mixers mount on
mic stands and allow the performer to make his or her own mix of
the eight sources, and send that mix to headphones, PEMs or even
powered or standard wedges. An included limiter on the mixer keeps
headphone mixes from getting dangerously loud and also keeps wedge
inputs from overloading.
The hubs include 24-bit A/D conversion at either 44.1 or 48 kHz
and can be daisy-chained for larger system needs. The mixers accept
an analog stereo aux-in signal in addition to the eight feeds from
the Cat 5, and channels can be easily linked for stereo operation.
We took a Hear Back Four Pack (a pre-packaged system with a hub,
four mixers and all the cables in a single box) out on a couple
of gigsa corporate event for 300 people with a four-piece
Cajun band called the Mojo Monkeys and an outdoor concert event
for 500 people with an eight-piece R&B band with horns.
First upthe corporate/Cajun gig. As the band was small and
we wanted to try the digital inputs on the Hear Back, we used a
Behringer DDX1632 digital mixer, sending eight bus outputs to the
Hear Back hub via the desks ADAT outs. The Hear Back is simplicity
itself, though getting those buses assigned to the ADAT outs on
the desk was unintuitive enough that we ended up opting for the
analog interface instead. Making the switch was a simple case of
throwing a single switch on the hubs front panel and breaking
out the included DA-88-style cable. Inputs 1 and 2 got a mirror
of the main stereo FOH mix, and we assigned drums and bass, guitar,
keys and vocals to each of the four auxes and made those inputs
3-6 to the hub. As the band had only requested two wedges, we sent
the hub signal over the included Cat 5 cables to a pair of mixers,
controlled by the front-person/drummer and by the guitarist.
The idea of giving musicians control over a wedge mix gave us both
horrid visions of screaming feedback and no way to control it from
our mix position on a balcony overlooking the event, at the side
of and 20 feet above the stage. To be safe, we ran a mono line out
from each mixer into a pair of unused channels on the snake, back
to FOH, and we kept the monitor amps next to us. It meant stupidly
long cable runs, but we had a degree of control. Turns out we probably
didnt need it, but the point is that this system is flexible
enough to get you what you need even in weird situations.
Once we were set up, the gig went largely without incident. The
client was happy and the band never complained about monitors. Read
that again: THE BAND NEVER COMPLAINED ABOUT MONITORS! When was the
last time that happened on a gig? Feedback began to bloom once or
twice, but a quick adjustment to the EQ for the vocal aux pretty
much took care of that. This was a totally pro band that knows how
to keep stage volume under control, but still, it was one of the
rare gigs when monitors were not an issue.
On the second concert gig, Jamie provided sound, while Bill was
actually there as a performer. His band has several members on PEMs
with the rest using wedges. A mix of auxes and direct outs were
used to give an eight-way mix consisting of a mirror of the FOH
L-R plus stereo feeds for drums and bass and keys and guitar and
mono feeds for horns and vocals. Stereo line outs from one mixer
went to the wireless rack for those on wireless PEMs, one mixer
powered two pairs of wired PEMs directly for drums and keys, while
the last two sent a mono line out to powered wedges for those not
on PEMs.
Again, the night went pretty much without incident. Most importantly,
feedback was never an issue even with the wedges. It was almost
as if, because the performers could hear what they really wanted,
they kept the overall volume of the wedges lower. In fact, after
the two gigs, our only real complaint about the system is that unplugging
the Cat 5 cable from the mixers at the end of the gig took some
real doing. On one hand, it is a really secure connection; on the
other, getting in there to disengage the connector required some
pretty major finger-yoga.
Is this system for everyone? Of course not. If you are mixing loud
garage bands who think everything is supposed to run at 11,
then giving them the control that the Hear Back system allows is
likely not a good idea. But for pro situations with responsible
musicians, especially for those using PEMs, the Hear Back is tough
to beat. In fact, if you are regularly providing sound for just
about any artist using PEMs, the Hear Back system is an investment
you should seriously consider making (Bill didhe picked up
the demo unit). At a retail list price of $1,295 for the Four Pack,
it easily beats just about any other PEM solution out there.

Courtesy of Front of House Magazine, July 2003 Vol.1 No. 10
Read the article from www.fohonline.com
|